LEGAL ARCHEOLOGY: STUDIES IN CASES IN CONTEXT LAW 214H1S VOL. II Professor Angela Fernandez Winter 2008 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO FACULTY OF LAW These materials have been reproduced for the exclusive use of students in the Faculty ’ of Law, University of Toronto and not for sale or reproduction. LEGAL ARCHEOLOGY: STUDIES IN CASES IN CONTEXT LAW 214H1S VOL. II Professor Angela Fernandez Winter 2008 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO FACULTY OF LAW These materials have been reproduced for the exclusive use of students in the Faculty of Law, University of Toronto and not for sale or reproduction. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from University of Toronto https://archive.org/details/legalarcheologys02fern READING WEEK IV. PERSPECTIVES & CASE-IN-CONTEXT STUDIES A. Persons in the Law (Class 7, February 25) Joan Vogel, “Cases in Context: Lake Champlain Wars, Gentrification and Ploofv. Putnam ,” 45 St. Louis University Law Journal (2001): 791-815 . 1 Judith L. Maute, “ Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co. Revisited: The Ballad of Willie and Lucille,” 89 Northwestern Law Review (1995): 1341, 1345-70, 1372-4, 1446-55, 1478-81 . 14 Debora L. Threedy, “Legal Archaeology: Excavating Cases, Reconstructing Context,” 80 Tulane Law Review (2006): 1197-1238 . 37 B. The Palsgraf Case (Class 8, March 3) Palsgrafv. Long Island Railroad Co. (N.Y. C.A. 1928) . 58 Richard A. Posner, Cardozo: A Study in Reputation (Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 1990) 33-57 . 62 John T. Noonan, Jr., “The Passengers of Palsgi'af ’ in Persons and Masks of the La\\>: Cardozo, Holmes, Jefferson, and Wythe as Makers of the Masks (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1975) 111-51, 191-97 . 75 C. The Palsgraf Case Cont. (Class 9, March 10) Andrew L. Kaufman, Cardozo (Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press, 1998) 286-312 . 100 Robert L. Rabin & Stephen D. Sugarman, “Introduction” to Tort Stories , Robert L. Rabin & Stephen D. Sugarman eds. (New York: Foundation Press, 2003) 1-10 . 115 Saul Levmore, “ The Wagon Mound Cases : Foreseeability, Causation, and Mrs. Palsgraf,” in Tort Stories, Robert L. Rabin & Stephen D. Sugarman eds. (New York: Foundation Press, 2003) 129-50 . 121 D. Duress & Consent (Class 10, March 17) Debora L. Threedy, “A Fish Story: Alaska Packers’ Association v. Domenico ,” Utah Law Review (2000): 185-221 . 133 Robert W. Gordon, “Using History in Teaching Contracts: The Case of Britton v. Turner ,” 26 University of Hawaii Law Review (2004): 421-34 . 1 52 2 Case & Introduction by Richard W. Bourne in “Five Approaches to Legal Reasoning in the Classroom: Contrasting Perspectives on O’Brien v. Cunard S.S. Co. Ltd. ,” 57 Missouri Law Review (1992): 346-62 . 158 Jay M. Feinman, “The Ideology of Legal Reasoning in the Classroom,” 57 Missouri Law Review (1992): 363-69 . 167 E. Consent cont. (Class 11, March 24) Ann C. Shalleck, “Feminist Legal Theory and the Reading of O’Brien v. Cunard ,” 57 Missouri Lca\> Review (1992): 371-97 . 171 Robert H. Lande, “A Law & Economics Perspective on a ‘Traditional’ Torts Case: Insights for Classroom and Courtroom,” 57 Missouri Law Review (1992): 399-441 . 185 Taunya Lovell Banks, “Teaching Laws With Flaws: Adopting a Pluralist Approach to Torts,” 57 Missouri Law Review (1992): 443-54 . 207 Richard W. Bourne, “A ‘Traditionalist’s’ Approach to Teaching O’Brien and to Ideology in the Classroom,” Jay M. Feinmann, “The Ideology of Legal Reasoning in the Classroom,” 57 Missouri Law Review (1992): 455-99 . 213 F. Roe v. Wade (Class 12, March 31) U.S. Constitution, 9th & 14th Amendments . 235 Griswold v. Connecticut , 381 U.S. 479 (1965), as reproduced in Craig R. Ducat, Constitutional Interpretation, 8th ed. (Belmont, CA: Thomson West, 2004) 707-13 . 236 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), as reproduced in Craig R. Ducat, Constitutional Interpretation, 8th ed. (Belmont, CA: Thomson West, 2004) 713-19 . 240 N.E.H. Hull & Peter Charles Hoffer, “Abortion and Birth Control” in Roe v. Wade: An Abortion Rights Controversy in American Histoiy, Landmark Law Cases & American Society Series (University Press of Kansas, 2001) 73-88 . 244 N.E.H. Hull & Peter Charles Hoffer, “From Repression to Reform, the Road to Roe, 1960-1970” in Roe v. Wade: An Abortion Rights Controversy in American History, Landmark Law Cases & American Society Series (University Press of Kansas, 2001) 89-134 . 252 Lucinda Finley, “The Story of Roe v. Wade: From a Garage Sale for Women’s Lib, to the Supreme Court, to Political Turmoil” in Constitutional Law Stories, Michael C. Dorf ed. (New York: Foundation Press, 2004) 359-405 . 275 3 G. Roe v. Wade cont. (Class 13, April 7) Jack M. Balkin, “ Roe v. Wade : An Engine of Controversy” in What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation ’s Top Experts Rewrite America ’s Most Controversial Decision (New York: New York University Press, 2005) 3-27 . 299 Riva B. Siegel, “Concurring,” in What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation ’s Top Experts Rewrite America ’s Most Controversial Decision (New York: New York University Press, 2005) 63-85 . 312 Mark Tushnet, “Concurring,” in What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation 's Top Experts Rewrite America ’s Most Controversial Decision (New York: New York University Press, 2005) 86-91 . 324 Cass Sunstein, “Concurring in the Judgment,” in What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation ’s Top Experts Rewrite America ’s Most Controversial Decision (New York: New York University Press, 2005) 148-51 . 327 Jeffrey Rosen, “Dissenting,” in What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation ’s Top Experts Rewrite America ’s Most Controversial Decision (New York: New York University Press, 2005) 170-86 . 329